Business Standard
Saturday, May 26, 2012
Sponsored by  
drived banner
drived banner
  Advanced Search
RSS
Content Guide
Follow us on  
|||||Opinion|||| 
 Section Home | Editorials | Compass | BS People | Columnists | Lunch with BS
Home > Opinion & Analysis Live Markets | Commodities
 

Sanjaya Baru: Indian minds, foreign funds
Governmental bureaucratism and niggardly corporates drive think tanks abroad for funds
Sanjaya Baru / New Delhi Aug 09, 2010, 00:55 IST

India’s best-known “think tanks” are becoming increasingly dependent for their funding on foreign benefactors. In economic policy, national security and foreign affairs, India’s premier think tanks and research institutions find it easier to raise funds abroad than at home, be it from a bureaucratic and feudal governmental system or from a miserly and disinterested corporate sector.

While some ministries, like external affairs, defence and commerce, have their own government-funded think tanks, others have their favourites in the non-governmental sector. Both are required to kowtow to the extant dispensation in the respective ministries — and many of these institutions have become sinecures for retired or retiring civil servants.

Indian corporates, on the other hand, have never been a major source of funding for research, even if they are increasingly funding education. Thus, Bharti’s Sunil Mittal, the only Indian mentioned in a Wikipedia list of world’s 100 top philanthropists, has liberally funded school and college education, including institutions like the Indian School of Business, but when it comes to supporting think tanks, he has so far preferred to help the Carnegie Endowment rather than any policy think tank in India. Same applies to most of India’s celebrated billionaires.

While Tata Sons have for a long time funded research institutions, Indian think tanks find the process of securing such funds becoming increasingly bureaucratic and so prefer courting foreign funding agencies. The Ambani family set up the Observer Research Foundation, with an impressive office, but it has so far attracted more retired diplomats and policy-makers than active researchers!

While India’s billionaires give away millions to Yale and Carnegie, India’s own think tanks are increasingly forced to turn to foreign funders because neither the government nor Indian corporates are willing to offer them untied funding.

Almost all the non-government economic, defence and foreign affairs think tanks and research institutions in the nation’s Capital are today more dependent on external sources of funding than domestic sources, government or non-government.

Major sources of research funds include multilateral financial institutions, like the World Bank and Asian Development Bank; western and eastern private foundations like Ford, Rockefeller, McCarthy and Sasakawa; and, foreign governments that fund agencies like Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC).

This is not a new phenomenon. There was a time when, in fact, India’s premier social sciences research funding institution, the Indian Council for Social Science Research (ICSSR), was itself receiving more funds from the Government of Netherlands than from the Government of India. Today, few foreign funding agencies bother routing their funds through the ICSSR, they do so directly.

Before worried nationalists raise a cry against this trend, they should find out what shape and condition of disrepair the ICSSR itself is in. Not only does the ICSSR have an officer of the Indian Administrative Service as its member-secretary, it has more than one council member without even a doctoral degree! Indeed, even radical social scientists who don’t like either government or corporate funding find it alright and easier to approach global non-governmental organisations for financial support.

In the field of international relations, India has as many as 65 listed research centres and “think tanks”. Of these, as many as 36 are located in New Delhi. A large number of these centres are funded by the government and the university system, but the most prominent ones are, in fact, funded by foreign governments and funding agencies! A substantial part of high-quality research on India’s relations with countries like China and Pakistan is, in fact, funded by foreign funding agencies.

It is not as if attempts have not been made by Indian scholars and researchers to secure corporate funding for Indian think tanks. But in most cases a mountain of effort is required, both in terms of lobbying and paperwork, to secure a molehill of funding. And, after all that and much interference in the running of the institution, there is little interest in the institution’s intellectual output.

India’s most respected strategic affairs guru, K Subrahmanyam, who ran a government-funded think tank, Institute of Defence Studies and Analysis (IDSA), as an independent and autonomous institution that respected the intellectual freedom of its faculty but found it very difficult to get anyone in government to listen to them or support their research work, once remarked to this writer, “I remember explaining to the director of Chatham House (UK) that the basic difference between IDSA and the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) is that the former gets all its money from the government but cannot get the time of the day from them, while the latter has to raise its own resources but gets all data and relevant information from government sources. Our senior bureaucrats have burdened themselves with so much of trivia because of the lack of a culture of delegation that they have no time to read such outside studies. Therefore, they have no use for them.”

The armed forces have become a bit liberal in funding think tanks, but these remain boutique institutions without the scope or size of a defence think tank like RAND in the United States.

I am not suggesting for a moment that as a consequence of this pattern of funding, Indian scholars have mortgaged their minds to foreign funders. Far from it. India’s most respected scholars, fiercely independent in their thinking, will never sing for their supper and allow the one who pays the piper choose the tune. Yet, for a country as big and important as India, it is a matter of great shame that so much of our best research and most important research institutions depend so much on external sources of funding.

Disclosure: The writer is on the governing board of Centre for Policy Research, Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies and Centre for Air Power Studies, New Delhi, and a consulting fellow of the International Institute of Strategic Studies, London.

New Ipad Application :Business Standard's all new IPad App
Click here to download for free
Arrow Other Stories     
- Markets end flat
- SAIL to add 5 mn tonne capacity in FY13
- NHPC FY12 net up 28% at Rs 2,772 cr
- Aarti Industries Q4 up nearly 27% at Rs 28.24 crore
- BPCL posts four-fold jump in Q4 net at Rs 3,963 cr
  Read Business news in 
- Journey on, We are by Your Side. Click here to know more
- Benefits Upto Rs. 2.36 Lakhs on the Fully Loaded TJet Petrol.
- The Best Seller is Also the No. 1 in Mileage. Click here
- Watch The Film Here. Click here to know more..
- Leader in Passenger Car & Automobile Tyres. Click here
- 1 billion in saving for Unilever without any tangles.
- A Brand New Server at a Price That Fits Your Budget. Click here
- Learn How One City is Running on FOOD SCRAPS.
- One Partnership Endless Possibilities. Click here to know more
- Helping doctors detect diseases earlier, saving costs & extending lives.
- 36 Lakhs can get you a pool of Luxuries. Click here
- Which is the best plan for your daughter
- Check out the TRUE COLOURS of your Stocks, Now for FREE!
- One of the leading business schools in the world.Know More
- Invest in Real Estate. Villas in Bangalore starting @ Rs.66 lacs
Sorry, comments to this story are closed
Latest Messages
Posted by: chethan
hats of to your work sir
Posted by: K.Mundanad
The statement that Indian corporates have never been a major source of funding for research, if was made after perusing the Directors' Report of all Indian companies, a different opinion would have been possible. Section 217(1) (e) of the Companies Act, 1956 mandates disclosure of expenditure (both capital & recurring) on R & D. As to whether the disclosed expenditure is "exclusively" on R & D is a mixed question of fact and law, though.
Table for Two
  Now available at Special price
  Rs.280/- Only

  Buy Now
BS POLL
UPA 2 has completed three years. How do you rate its performance?  Read the story
  Good
  Average
  Bad
Submit
Most Popular
Read
E-Mailed
Commented
   
- Reddy rules out rollback of rise in petrol prices
- Ajit Singh meets striking pilots
- IPL on turning track, broadcast revenue down by a third
- FIIs bet heavily in Indian market, but in Singapore
- No country for easy skill development
 
 More  
Tax Shastra
  Now available at Special price
  Rs. 360/- Only

  Buy Now
  Hot Searches  
 
Apalya |  Air India |  GAAR |  Agni  |  Solar eclipse |  Satyamev Jayate |  SRK |  Aamir Khan |  IPL |  Ertiga |  Sarfaesi Act |  Vodafone |  JP Morgan |  Transfer pricing |  Rupee |  Kingfisher Airlines |  Silver |  Provident Fund |  income tax refund |  iPhone |  Reliance Industries |  SEBI |  BSNL |  BSE |  NSE |  Mukesh Ambani |  Anil Ambani |  Infosys |  Pranab Mukherjee |  Sonia Gandhi |  Rahul Gandhi |  New Pension Scheme |  Reliance |  RBI |  GDP |  Gold |  Ratan Tata |  ICICI |  B-School |  Sensex |  Tax calculator |  Home Loan |  Personal Finance |  inflation |  oil prices |  Barack Obama |   
 
  Member Area Write to the Editor RSS Archives Advanced Search
  Subscribe to BS print product BS e-paper Newsletter Portfolio Tracker
  BS Products BS Hindi BS Motoring BS Books
Home | Markets & Investing | Companies & Industry | Banking & Finance | Economy & Policy | Opinion
Life & Leisure | Management & Marketing | Tech World | General News
About Us | Partner With Us | Code of Conduct | Careers | Advertise with us| Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Contact Us